Comparative procedural law Perspectives from Latin America

Derecho procesal comparado Perspectivas desde América Latina

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Eduardo Oteiza
Abstract

The comparative procedural law and the particularities of the contemporary social environment in Latin America constitute, starting from the present analysis, a study of the norms,  the processes and the institutions.   In this same sense, the content of diverse international instruments is presented, which protect the main procedural guarantees that each human being has.  Guarantees such as the right to be heard before a court, to an equal process, to legal guarantees, that his/her case be heard,  are deeply analyzed in the context of the present article with the purpose to achieve the right to equality and to the defense that each human being deserves.

Keywords

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Author Biography / See

Eduardo Oteiza

Full professor (by competition), researcher (by competition) and director of the Master's Degree in Procedural Law at the University of La Plata and president of the International Association of Procedural Law (2019). In 2019 he was elected president of the Argentine Association of Procedural Law (2011-2013) and the Ibero-American Institute of Procedural Law (2014-2018). He completed the Jean Monnet Fellow postdoctoral program at the European University Institute (1987-1988) and was a fellow at CONICET (1987), the European Law Academy (1991), the University of Bologna (1993), and the GIZ ( German Gesellchaft für Internationale Zusamenarbeit (2013). He was a member of the Advisory Council of the Justice 2020 program of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights of Argentina (2016-2019) in which he was co-editor of the National Civil and Commercial Procedure Code. He was a guest professor, among others, from the following universities: Bologna, Turin, Genoa, Brescia, Florence, York (Toronto), Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona), Medellín, Pontifica de Lima and the Max Planck Institute (Luxembourg).

References

Chodosh, H. E, Global Justice Reform. A Comparative Methodo- logy, Nueva York, New York University.

Cooke, J.B., The Federalist, Wesleyan University Press, 1961. Couture, E. J., Trayectoria y destino del derecho procesal civil hispano-americano, Boletín de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad de Córdoba, mayo-junio 1940.

David, R., Jauffret-Spinossi, C., Los grandes sistemas jurídicos con- temporáneos, 1969, consultada la 10ª Edición, UNAM, Méxi- co, 2010, traducción de José Sanchez Cordero.

López-Medina, D. El nacimiento del derecho comparado moderno como espacio geográfico y como disciplina: instrucciones básicas para su comprensión y uso desde América Latina, International Law: Revista Colombiana De Derecho Internacio- nal, 13(26), 127, https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.il15-26.ndcm.

Oteiza, E., Sendas de la reforma de la justicia a principios del Siglo XXI, Madrid, Marcial Pons, 2018.

Posner, E., Sunstein, C. R., The Law of Other States, 59 Stanford Law Review 131 (2006).

Pound, R., What May We Expect from Comparative Law?, Ameri- can Bar Association Journal, 1936, 22, 58-59, posición reiterada en Comparative Law in Space and Time, American Journal of Comparative Law, 1955.

Trocker, N., Varano, V. The reforms of civil procedure in comparative perspective, Turín, Giappicheli Editore, 2005.

Vescovi, E., Elementos para una teoría general del proceso civil lati- noamericano, México, UNAM, 1978.

Woo, M., Comparative Law: A Plurality of Methods, en Approaches to Procedural Law, The Pluralism of Methods, Cadiet, L., Hess, B., Resquejo Isidro, M, Baden-Bades, 2017.

Zuckerman, A. A. S., Civil Justice in Crisis. Comparative Perspectives of Civil Procedure, Oxford University Press, 1999.

OJS System - Metabiblioteca |