The Constitutional Reforms of 2019: Lessons from a failed attempt and overcoming a decade of disenchantment

Las Reformas Constitucionales de 2019: Lecciones de un intento fallido y superación de una década de desencanto

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Arturo Hoyos
Abstract

The 2019 Constitutional Reforms in Panama, was an attempt that did not succeed but left lessons that we keep as experience and that créate a path where participants or actors in the new national dialogue should not lose sight of. Aditionally: Is it conducive to establishing a Constitutional Court? They are high concerns in the article, which allows the author to distinguish the role or function of the Constitutional Courts, through Its study.

Keywords

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Author Biography / See

Arturo Hoyos

Doctor in Law (Doctoris Scientiae Juridicae) at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (Santa Fe de Bogotá, Colombia) with Specialization Diplomas in Socioeconomic Sciences and in Labor Law, in 1972 and 1970 respectively, Master in Development Economics at the University of Sussex (England, United Kingdom of Great Britain) in 1974. He was a Judge in the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Panama between 1990 and 2005 and presided over the institution for 6 years (1994-2000), which makes him the Jurist who has held that position for the longest time in the recent history of the Republic of Panama. He was elected in 1995 as the first President of the Organization of Supreme Courts of the Americas in Washington DC.

OJS System - Metabiblioteca |